W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Sep 2009 11:54:57 +0200
Message-ID: <4AB0B5F1.40400@gmx.de>
To: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
CC: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Sam Johnston wrote:
> ...
> For example, I was looking for a relation to describe the "most recent 
> version" of a resource (as distinct from a specific version in a VCS). 
> I'd have used "current" were it not for its definition in RFC 5005 as "a 
> feed document containing the most recent entries in the feed" (for which 
> 'recent' would have been a better term IMO). Now I need to either try to 
> shift the existing definition or find another like 'latest' - without 
> regard to the registry we'd have ended up with two conflicting definitions.
> ...


 > ...

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 16 September 2009 09:55:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:51 UTC