W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Last Call: draft-nottingham-http-link-header (Web Linking) to Proposed Standard

From: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 06:24:00 +0200
Message-ID: <21606dcf0908312124r3f093072o4b12a7ee10b53f32@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Joe Gregorio <joe@bitworking.org>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Tue, Sep 1, 2009 at 5:00 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> The easiest way for them to use the link framework would be to use
> extension relations for ones that are specific to their application... i.e.,
> not register them.
>

Right, but in that case they should use URLs, right?

Sam
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 04:24:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:10 GMT