W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Multi-server HTTP

From: Anthony Bryan <anthonybryan@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:03:10 -0400
Message-ID: <bb9e09ee0908311303u241fcf45sb4a8371aed1bd132@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, "Ford, Alan" <alan.ford@roke.co.uk>, Robert Siemer <Robert.Siemer-http@backsla.sh>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org, Mark Handley <m.handley@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I don't think so; 'alternate' doesn't specify for what purpose it's an
> alternate, and you need a very precise definition (byte-for-byte equivalence
> of representations). 'alternate' is often used to mean "here's a copy in
> another format" and similar.
> Perhaps you should mint 'duplicate'...

Ok, this is what I have in the ID now:

Link Relation Type Registration: "duplicate"

o Relation Name: duplicate
o Description: Refers to an identical resource that is a byte-for-byte
equivalence of representations.
o Reference: This specification.

(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads
Received on Monday, 31 August 2009 20:03:53 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:51 UTC