Re: Multi-server HTTP

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Mark Nottingham<mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> I don't think so; 'alternate' doesn't specify for what purpose it's an
> alternate, and you need a very precise definition (byte-for-byte equivalence
> of representations). 'alternate' is often used to mean "here's a copy in
> another format" and similar.
>
> Perhaps you should mint 'duplicate'...

Ok, this is what I have in the ID now:

Link Relation Type Registration: "duplicate"

o Relation Name: duplicate
o Description: Refers to an identical resource that is a byte-for-byte
equivalence of representations.
o Reference: This specification.

-- 
(( Anthony Bryan ... Metalink [ http://www.metalinker.org ]
  )) Easier, More Reliable, Self Healing Downloads