W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Link: grandfathered format-specific registered relations

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:06:42 +1000
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <C86A0AC3-EDAC-4099-B8F1-2E009D0CCC25@mnot.net>
To: Sam Johnston <samj@samj.net>
They should, but because these were registered previously, they aren't.


On 20/08/2009, at 5:06 PM, Sam Johnston wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>  
> wrote:
> I'm thinking that the following registered relations are in fact  
> specific to one format or application, and this should be noted in  
> their registrations.
>
> current
> edit
> edit-media
> enclosure
> next-archive
> prev-archive
> replies
> service
>
> Comments?
>
> I would have thought that the relations should be generic and the  
> types specific.
>
> Sam
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 21 August 2009 05:07:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT