Re: Link: grandfathered format-specific registered relations

They should, but because these were registered previously, they aren't.


On 20/08/2009, at 5:06 PM, Sam Johnston wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>  
> wrote:
> I'm thinking that the following registered relations are in fact  
> specific to one format or application, and this should be noted in  
> their registrations.
>
> current
> edit
> edit-media
> enclosure
> next-archive
> prev-archive
> replies
> service
>
> Comments?
>
> I would have thought that the relations should be generic and the  
> types specific.
>
> Sam
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/