W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: #184: HTTP/0.9

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:27:04 +0200
Cc: "William A. Rowe, Jr." <wrowe@rowe-clan.net>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <5B6C1F1B-CCD9-4754-B1BC-BBF10826DF25@googlemail.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On 11 Aug 2009, at 19:11, Julian Reschke wrote:

> William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
>> ...
>> The assumption that HTTP/0.9 should be understood shouldn't be  
>> removed
>> until HTTP/1.2, I'd expect?  Surely there are many slim clients that
>> rely on trivial http: requests, even today.
>
> Really?
>
> What's the situation for today's servers, such as recent httpds,  
> IIS, Tomcat..,?

They all support HTTP/0.9. Clients have to support HTTP/0.9 for web  
compatibility (or at least those that care about web compatibility  
do), primarily due to broken CGI scripts.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
Received on Tuesday, 11 August 2009 19:27:49 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT