W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Issue 131 (increase connection limit), Re: p1-message-07 S 7.1.4

From: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:42:21 -0700 (PDT)
cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0908052041370.18433@egate.xpasc.com>

Add me as well as supporting this approach.

On Thu, 6 Aug 2009, Adrien de Croy wrote:

> 
> I think that's a good approach.
> 
> Adrien
> 
> 
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
>  ons 2009-08-05 klockan 11:28 -0700 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> 
>
>  This was discussed at the Stockholm meeting.
> 
> The feeling in the room was that the right thing to do is not specify 
> any specific numeric limit, but instead to give advice on limiting the 
> number of connections, illustrating the problems and trade-offs.
> 
> Comments?
> 
>
>  +1, now as then.
> 
> 
> Regards
> Henrik
> 
>
> 
> 
>
>  -- 
> Adrien de Croy - WinGate Proxy Server - http://www.wingate.com
> 
>
Received on Thursday, 6 August 2009 03:43:05 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT