W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Issue 43 (combining fragments)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 28 Jul 2009 17:42:20 +0200
Message-ID: <4A6F1C5C.40803@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tis 2009-07-28 klockan 17:32 +0200 skrev Henrik Nordstrom:
>> And we don't allow fragments in Location or Content-Location either,
>> with both referencing absoluteURI and not URI-reference. Neither 2068,
>> 2396 or 3986 (in the form of absolute-URI) allows fragments in this
>> production.
> My error. Forgot that we had changed Location to reference URI instead
> of absolute-URI.
> So my question in light of what has been seen, should that change stay
> or should we revert back to absolute-URI as used by 2068 and 2616 moving
> the use of fragments back into the "undefined" field?

They are used in practice, and their behavior *is* defined in case the 
original URI didn't have a fragment.

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 28 July 2009 15:43:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT