W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: Semantics of extension methods

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 19:25:52 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1248715552.24785.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
mån 2009-07-27 klockan 16:44 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> > mån 2009-07-27 klockan 15:48 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
> > 
> >> Now that we indeed have a method registry, is this still true?
> > 
> > The risk is smaller, but still present to some extent during transition.
> > Over time it will disappear entirely.
> > 
> > So I would say we don't need to state this any longer.
> > ...
> 
> Or we could state the obvious: using an extension that is not registered 
> can cause confusion if multiple independent extensions pick the same name.

I assumed that's already understood from the text. Was more concerned
about the risk that there is extensions being used used which isn't
registered today and that future extensions collide with those.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Monday, 27 July 2009 17:26:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT