W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2009

Re: p6 2.7 combining 206 & ETag, p5 5.3 If-Range

From: Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Jul 2009 04:09:41 -0400 (EDT)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
cc: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.1.10.0907240408370.26951@wnl.j3.bet>
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> Good catch.
>
>
> On 24/07/2009, at 10:23 AM, Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>
>> p6 2.7:
>>
>>       If the status code is 206 (partial content), both the stored and
>>       new responses MUST have cache validators, and those cache
>>       validators MUST match using the strong comparison function (see
>>       Section 4 of [Part4]). Otherwise, the responses MUST NOT be
>>       combined.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> I'll let others speak to the proposed change to p5.

The change to p5 is fixing the same kind of discrepancy, so the fix sounds 
perfectly right.

-- 
Baroula que barouleras, au tiéu toujou t'entourneras.

         ~~Yves
Received on Friday, 24 July 2009 08:09:53 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:08 GMT