Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> No one has complained about it being editorial, so it's your 
>> (collective, theoretically) decision.
>>
>> Of course, they may complain *after* it's in, but that's how it goes.
>> ...
> 
> Indeed.
> 
> Change applied with 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/576>.

This was an editorial issue, and the change is present in the -07 drafts 
published last week. Therefore, I'm closing the issue in the tracker as 
well.

BR, Julian

Received on Monday, 20 July 2009 06:18:45 UTC