W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: Referer URI MUST NOT include a fragment

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 16:25:01 +1100
Cc: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <0332C108-3534-41AC-9D40-619C5B0FBB35@mnot.net>
To: Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Yes - part of that discussion needs to be exactly what is included in  
the referer URI.


On 26/02/2009, at 11:05 AM, Larry Masinter wrote:

> At least a while ago, it was looking like the
> "Origin" header proposal might instead be subsumed
> by an extension to "Referer" instead, which seemed
> like a positive direction. I don't think allowing
> fragment identifiers in Referer for other purposes
> would interfere with that.

Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Thursday, 26 February 2009 05:25:40 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:48 UTC