W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2009

Re: PATCH draft

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa.dusseault@messagingarchitects.com>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:34:42 +0000
Cc: Lisa Dusseault <lisad@messagingarchitects.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <6DC8D5E1-C46C-4E59-82D7-F46EA89968ED@messagingarchitects.com>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>

On Feb 4, 2009, at 10:22 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> I'm not sure what your point is... That there are servers and  
> clients out there which are broken with respect to weak etag  
> handling? I agree with that, but I do not agree that this means the  
> PATCH spec should rule out their use.

Nothing to do with PATCH -- I got my threads crossed.

> PS: And, btw, httpbis currently *does* define that W/"foo" and "foo"  
> match weakly; see <http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-httpbis-p4-conditional-05.html#rfc.section.5 
> > and <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/71>.

This is great.  I looked for this before starting my rant, but sorry  
to say I missed it.  Thanks!


--- Scanned by M+ Guardian Messaging Firewall ---
Messaging Architects sponsors The Spamhaus Project.
Received on Wednesday, 4 February 2009 20:36:42 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:48 UTC