Entirely agreeing with your points, I'm confused on one point... Roy T. Fielding wrote: > > 5) The author seems to be unaware that URL is a deprecated term > defined in RFC 3986. The field values would be better defined > in terms on the standard URI grammar and terminology. When does RFC 3986 become binding on HTTP/1.1? I was presuming that doesn't happen until the next RFC, although the author should take note of the discrepancy.Received on Thursday, 22 January 2009 23:29:07 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:35 GMT