W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Content Sniffing impact on HTTPbis - #155

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 10:47:31 +0200
Message-ID: <4A3367A3.4070205@gmx.de>
To: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Ian Hickson wrote:
> ...
>> Separately, as an editorial comment, as listed directly above, I'd like 
>> to see a big s/resource/resource representation/g (or just 
>> s/resource/representation/g as the resource is what is identified by the 
>> URI, not the bag-o-bits returned in an HTTP response.  I have some other 
>> editorial comments too, but those will have to wait until I have time to 
>> write them down.
> 
> A resource is a bag of bits. I would object to this change.

Mark is correct. Please use terminology consistent with other IETF specs.

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 13 June 2009 08:48:15 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:03 GMT