W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Proposal: 205 Bodies [#88]

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 00:26:09 +0200
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1244672769.27002.133.camel@localhost.localdomain>
mån 2009-06-08 klockan 21:06 +1000 skrev Mark Nottingham:
> I.e., allow entity bodes on 205?
> 
> *shrug* In the scheme of things, it's not that important, I suppose,  
> since they're not widely used. However, it seems you'd have the same  
> philosophical debates either way -- "what is the meaning of an entity  
> on a 205 response" vs. "what is the meaning of the entity headers on a  
> 205 response"?

Undefined, just as entities in GET request are. No big deal.

Regards
Henrik
Received on Wednesday, 10 June 2009 22:26:50 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:03 GMT