W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Issue 166: clarify term "User Agent" and resolve inconsistencies with W3C specs

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 17:48:58 +1000
Cc: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Larry Masinter <masinter@adobe.com>
Message-Id: <D6832158-E4D3-4336-9D73-E5B5CAA0ECA1@mnot.net>
To: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
I'd agree the chosen terminology isn't great. Not sure that changing  
it wouldn't cause more proplems than it solves.


On 02/06/2009, at 5:16 PM, Daniel Stenberg wrote:

> On Tue, 2 Jun 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote:
>
>> To me, the biggest difference is that a UA is the end node; i.e.,  
>> it is the 'origin client' to compliment the 'origin server.' A  
>> proxy is a client, not a user-agent.
>
> Ah yes. That's a very good point, but isn't it a bit too subtle to  
> name an end-point "UA" while an end-point or proxy is called  
> "client" ?
>
> I mean, if the distinction in the docs need to separate an end-point  
> from a proxy, won't for example those (more explicit) terms be  
> better to use then?
>
> -- 
>
> / daniel.haxx.se
>


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 3 June 2009 07:49:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:03 GMT