W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: draft-ietf-httpbis-p6-cache-06

From: Thomas Broyer <t.broyer@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 27 May 2009 16:49:01 +0200
Message-ID: <a9699fd20905270749l37d8ee96m779c76f9aac7fbbe@mail.gmail.com>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, May 27, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org> wrote:
> Adrien de Croy wrote:
>> So it's invalid to include a Cache-Control: public say on the POST
>> response?
>
> It's not invalid, but it doesn't mean anything. POST responses are never
> cacheable; caches must write POST requests through to the server, and a
> cache can't use a POST response to respond to a GET/HEAD request.

Even when the POST response has a Content-Location?

-- 
Thomas Broyer
Received on Wednesday, 27 May 2009 14:49:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:03 GMT