W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 09:13:29 +0200
Message-ID: <4A07D019.70606@gmx.de>
To: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
CC: Brian Smith <brian@briansmith.org>, 'Geoffrey Sneddon' <foolistbar@googlemail.com>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Martin J. Dürst wrote:
> That seems to be backward. Wouldn't the comments be helpful in the 
> collected ABNF, too?

The collected ABNF is produced by an ABNF parser (Bill Fenner's), by 
serializing the rule objects it generates. Thus, it doesn't have the 
comments anymore.

BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 11 May 2009 07:14:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT