W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Issue 164, was: Statuscodes

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Sat, 09 May 2009 18:19:30 +0200
Message-ID: <4A05AD12.3070207@gmx.de>
To: David Morris <dwm@xpasc.com>
CC: Stefan Tilkov <stefan.tilkov@innoq.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
David Morris wrote:
>> Wishful thinking, I guess :-)
>>
>> See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/164>.
>>
>> That being said, it's not clear to me that this is even feasible or a 
>> good idea.
> 
> Seems like you can fix this by removing the "_including ... methods(s)_"
> phrase. Or saying 'examples of'. I think the right place for any 
> information correlating status codes with methods in a normative was is
> with the method description, not the status code.

Fixed by removing that part of the sentence. See 
<http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/579>.

BR, Julian
Received on Saturday, 9 May 2009 16:20:16 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT