W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Issue 163, was: Meaning of invalid but well-formed dates

From: Geoffrey Sneddon <foolistbar@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 18:25:08 +0100
Cc: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1AB0BF4A-6823-467A-B2B2-6F32E9521F3D@googlemail.com>
To: "Brian Smith" <brian@briansmith.org>

On 8 May 2009, at 18:08, Brian Smith wrote:

> I don't get why s-Mon, s-Jan, l-Mon, etc. are named productions  
> (instead of
> unnamed alternatives like in RFC 5023), but that is not new to this  
> change.

Case sensitivity. Plain strings in ABNF are case insensitive.


--
Geoffrey Sneddon
<http://gsnedders.com/>
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 17:25:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT