W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Issue 164, was: Statuscodes

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 08 May 2009 18:19:11 +0200
Message-ID: <4A045B7F.1060305@gmx.de>
To: Stefan Tilkov <stefan.tilkov@innoq.com>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Stefan Tilkov wrote:
> Apologies if this is covered elsewhere, but
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-httpbis-p2-semantics-06#section-8 says
> "Each Status-Code is described below, _including a description of which
> method(s)_ it can follow and any metainformation required in the response."
> but doesn't actually name the methods.
> ...

Wishful thinking, I guess :-)

See <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/164>.

That being said, it's not clear to me that this is even feasible or a 
good idea.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 16:19:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT