W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Issue 161, was: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 08:50:42 +0200
Message-ID: <4A013342.7040409@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Julian Reschke wrote:
> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> It gives me a bit of pause, but I think that's OK (as long as they're 
>> all clearly defined as DIGITs).
>> ...
> 
> They are.
> 
> Proposed patch: 
> <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/attachment/ticket/161/161.diff>. 

I have heard no complaints so far; should I make this change?

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 06:51:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT