W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: i37: Vary and non-existant headers

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 06 May 2009 08:43:22 +0200
Message-ID: <4A01318A.1070400@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Looking back at this discussion, I think we have agreement to drop 
> 'present' (as per Roy), and add the "When a resource's 
> representations..." sentence.

The current text in draft 06 is different from the one that was 
discussed in earlier emails; so I'll have to re-read the thread and 
compare what's in now with what's in RFC 2616...

> I don't see consensus to add language about canonicalising request 
> headers (beyond the process described in p6 2.6).

That's issue <http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/147>, 
right? Do we expect consensus to emerge in the future (that is, do we 
leave the issue open)?

BR, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 6 May 2009 06:44:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT