W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

From: Brian Smith <brian@GOROGORO.mobi>
Date: Fri, 1 May 2009 19:38:36 -0500
To: "'Mark Nottingham'" <mnot@mnot.net>, "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <001b01c9cabe$556e0380$004a0a80$@mobi>
Mark Nottingham wrote:
> It gives me a bit of pause, but I think that's OK (as long as they're
> all clearly defined as DIGITs).
>
> Julian Reschke wrote:
...
> > We currently have more place where we say "decimal"; should I
> > simplify those as well?
...

Yes. Let the ABNF define the notation and let the prose focus on the
semantics. The grammar isn't good enough unless a 100%-compliant recognizer
can be automatically generated from it. Further, being able to understand
the ABNF is a precondition for understanding the spec. Any description of
the syntax in the prose is superfluous at best, and misleading at worst.

- Brian
Received on Saturday, 2 May 2009 00:39:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT