Re: Base for first-byte-pos, last-byte-pos, suffix-length

On 17/04/2009, at 4:53 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Mark Nottingham wrote:
>> +1 to just removing the language around C-L; DIGIT is unambiguous.
>
> +1.

Sounds like you have enough to go on, then (this is an editorial issue).

Cheers,


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/