W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: [link draft] Changing the model for links

From: Eran Hammer-Lahav <eran@hueniverse.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 18:26:56 -0700
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
CC: Phil Archer <phil@philarcher.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C6029CF0.15C45%eran@hueniverse.com>


On 4/8/09 4:40 PM, "Mark Nottingham" <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:

> 
> 
> On 09/04/2009, at 4:37 AM, Ian Hickson wrote:
>> [snip]
>> Similarly, the position of <link> elements relative to other elements
>> (e.g. <style>, <script>) and HTTP Link: headers is relevant to
>> behaviour.
> 
> Making this explicit shouldn't present a problem. What's the preferred
> precedence in HTML5?

Are you referring to the order of precedence between HTTP Link and HTML
Link?
 
> Is there an argument that 'media' is generic to all links, and is
> there a content-neutral way to describe it? If so, we can get it in
> there...

I think Link is getting ready to ship, and don't think we should extend it
at this point. If someone wants a media extension, I would suggest writing a
new I-D for it.

EHL 
Received on Thursday, 9 April 2009 01:27:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT