W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

RE: NEW ISSUE: content sniffing

From: Brian Smith <brian@GOROGORO.mobi>
Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2009 02:42:12 +0000
To: "'HTTP Working Group'" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <00b501c9b7f3$880f9bb0$982ed310$@mobi>
Mark Baker wrote:
> My previous suggestion is as far as I would feel comfortable going
> along these lines;
> 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg/2009AprJun/0018.html

+1. There's a lot of text in RFC 2616 that are better off removed because
they don't actually help define the protocol; often these parts of the spec
just create confusion. This is a prime example.

- Brian
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:29:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT