W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: PROPOSAL: content sniffing [#155]

From: Adam Barth <w3c@adambarth.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 00:09:15 -0700
Message-ID: <7789133a0904080009j64286530x155e2bc9eb308eda@mail.gmail.com>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: Mark Baker <mark@coactus.com>, "=JeffH" <Jeff.Hodges@kingsmountain.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net> wrote:
> Yep. The point I'm making is that because there isn't a RFC2119 requirement
> there currently, conforming implementations are fine; adding a new one just
> adds complexity...

Ok.  Thanks for the crash course in reading these specs.  :)

Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 07:10:06 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT