W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: PATCH draft

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2009 16:39:46 +1000
Cc: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>, Lisa Dusseault <lisad@messagingarchitects.com>, ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <8461379F-5F3A-4906-9140-9BBF653258B3@mnot.net>
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
I *think* this is tied up in #110 and #22...


On 31/01/2009, at 3:39 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:

> Cyrus Daboo wrote:
>> - In the example in Section 2.1 there is a Content-MD5 header in  
>> the response. What does that refer to? The actual response body is  
>> empty.
>
> Right. This contradicts the definition of Content-MD5 (<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/rfc2616.html#rfc.section.14.15 
> >), so it probably would be good to remove it.
>
> That being said: I think the HTTPbis definition of Content-MD5  
> should be changed so that it can be sent with a 204 as updated  
> metadata. (new issue?)


--
Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 06:40:24 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT