Now #156 (editorial): http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/156 On 31/03/2009, at 11:22 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote: > There's a growing amount of interest in running HTTP in ways other > than the way it's described as using TCP in RFC2616. This includes > the ongoing discussion of HTTP-over-SCTP as well as more radical > approaches such as "reverse HTTP." > > To make the specification of such mechanisms easier and less prone > to error, p1 should be arranged so that TCP-specific connection > details be isolated from the rest of the specification. An alternate > approach would be to factor such aspects into a separate draft, but > this is probably not necessary (i.e., as long as it's easy to > identify which parts of p1 are overridden, that should be enough). > > -- > Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/ > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/Received on Wednesday, 8 April 2009 06:03:42 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT