- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 02:52:31 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, Roy Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com>, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
On Tue, 7 Apr 2009, Mark Nottingham wrote: > > Anne and Ian, does this adequately encompass your issue? If other > aspects are important, it would be helpful if you provided a succinct > summary. IIRC, browsers have found it impossible to implement Content-Location as setting the base URI for a document without breaking significant content on the Web. So long as what HTTP defines is implementable in a manner that is compatible with legacy content, the issue would be resolved, I think. IMHO it is not critical whether this is done by making the header have no effect, have some other effect, or removing the header altogether (though the former seems pointless). -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 02:53:08 UTC