W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Minutes from informal IETF/W3C meeting about HTML5 work

From: Martin J. Dürst <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2009 16:34:51 +0900
Message-ID: <49D3191B.6070409@it.aoyama.ac.jp>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>, Apps Discuss <discuss@apps.ietf.org>, public-iri@w3.org
At one point, it definitely was. Many people on the uri list were not
interested in IRI issues, and some i18n experts on the IRI list weren't
interested in URI issues.

Of course, times may have changed, and in case we'd decide to
stuff all the HTML5 bugwards-compatibility stuff for URIs into the
IRI spec because the URI spec is already at Full Standard, things
might change.

Regards,    Martin.

On 2009/03/31 20:10, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Just thinking out loud -- is it *really* a good idea to have separate
> URI and IRI lists?
>
> Cheers,
Received on Wednesday, 1 April 2009 07:35:55 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:51:02 GMT