W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

RE: HTTP 301 responses for POST

From: Daniel Stenberg <daniel@haxx.se>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2008 09:06:51 +0100 (CET)
To: "ietf-http-wg@w3.org" <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.LRH.2.00.0812230900010.10399@yvahk3.pbagnpgbe.fr>

On Sun, 21 Dec 2008, Eric Lawrence wrote:

> Can you please elaborate further here-- do specific examples come to mind?
> For as long as I can recall, Netscape, IE, Firefox, Safari, etc, have 
> treated 301, 302, and 303 as "redirect with GET" while 307 is treated as 
> "redirect with original method."  This matches Yngve's findings.
> I would be fascinated to find a web browser that behaves differently.

I don't have the specific users nor servers around to tell, no. I guess I'm 
just saying that the wording in RFC2616 has made people go both ways and thus 
boys ways is what we've felt necessary to support in our redirection-following 

It's of course entirely possible that this was done for something that weren't 
including any of the major browsers, but the fact remains. In my reading, a 
POST that gets a 301 or 302 back, SHOULD NOT change that to a GET in the 
subsequent request. The only clients who'd do that are those who want to mimic 
old non-compliant browsers. Of course, that ends up just about all browsers I 
guess (including libcurl in its default behavior).


  / daniel.haxx.se
Received on Tuesday, 23 December 2008 08:07:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:47 UTC