W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Removing multipart/byteranges as a message delimiter -- implementation survey [#90]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 11:13:29 +1100
Message-Id: <BD1A809C-2771-4D76-B1CD-F7FC72E5C16A@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

It seems like there's pretty strong support for removing multipart/ 
related as a message delimiter (I.e., removing RFC2616 section 4.4,  
bullet #4).

However, I want to move carefully here, because this is a change at a  
very low level, with potentially far-reaching effects.

To that end, could folks who have implementations, or have tested  
them, please fill out the implementation spreadsheet;
I've added an appropriate column on the clients, intermediaries and  
servers sheets.

(if you can't or don't have time to post to the spreadsheet, please  
send to the list).


On 12/12/2008, at 4:17 AM, Jamie Lokier wrote:

> Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
>>> They aren't used that way.  I don't know of any implementation
>>> that uses the multipart delimiter to find the end of body (they
>>> use CL, chunked, or a closed connection).
>> Hmm.. you may be right. On a closer inspection I see that I misread  
>> some
>> of the data. Sorry for the confusion.
>> So it looks like dropping 4.4 4 entirely may be an option.
> If it's possible to drop support for multipart/byterange delimited
> messages, because it's not used anyway, that would be a really good
> thing imho.  It's an ugly, pointless, unused and probably poorly
> implemented complication in message parsers.
> -- Jamie

Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Friday, 12 December 2008 00:14:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 1 March 2016 11:10:47 UTC