Mark Nottingham wrote: > Right, OK; that's the subtle bit. Julian, make sense? > ... It *is* about trust, right? (1) A -rev-> B implies the same relation as (2) B -rel-> A *but* it's A making the statement; just because A makes a claim about a rev link doesn't necessarily that B agrees about that (and will expose the link as well). So the problem with the language in HTML4 is that it uses the term "reverse link" instead of "reverse (link) relation"? BR, JulianReceived on Thursday, 11 December 2008 08:56:33 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:34 GMT