W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > October to December 2008

Re: Feedback for draft-nottingham-http-link-header-03

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2008 09:44:33 +0100
Message-ID: <4940D2F1.1060705@gmx.de>
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
CC: "Roy T. Fielding" <fielding@gbiv.com>, Yves Lafon <ylafon@w3.org>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Right, OK; that's the subtle bit. Julian, make sense?
> ...

It *is* about trust, right?

(1)  A -rev-> B

implies the same relation as

(2)  B -rel-> A

*but* it's A making the statement; just because A makes a claim about a 
rev link doesn't necessarily that B agrees about that (and will expose 
the link as well).

So the problem with the language in HTML4 is that it uses the term 
"reverse link" instead of "reverse (link) relation"?

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 11 December 2008 08:56:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:58 GMT