Eran Hammer-Lahav wrote: > ... >> 5. The Link Header Field >> >> Link = "Link" ":" #link-value > > The '#' operator is not defined in the referenced ABNF provided (it is defined in the original spec). RFC 2616, Section 2.1. > ... >> Each link-value conveys one target URI inside angle brackets ("<>"). >> If it is relative, it MUST be resolved as per [RFC3986]. Note that >> because it is conveyed in a header, base URIs from content are not >> applied to it. > > Just confirming that URI-Reference can be an empty string, i.e.: Link: <>; rel="something". It is needed for using links with URI-templates [1] where the link value is constructed using a template that does not fit in the URI-Reference space (using a link header extension). Sorry? If the URI-Reference is empty, then the target URI is the one of the context. If you want to introduce an extension point for URI templates, we'll need to specify it explicitly. > ... BR, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 2 December 2008 07:44:08 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:34 GMT