- From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2008 11:05:18 +0100
- To: Helge Hess <helge.hess@opengroupware.org>
- CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Helge Hess wrote: > Yes. The problem is that Julian pushes his POST extension towards WebDAV > based protocols (CalDAV/CardDAV). While I'm not against adding a > specialized POST as an extension, it does not really fit WebDAV and IMHO > does not belong into such (DAV) specs. Hence I think it has little > chance for adoption. > ... Well, I continue to disagree. For instance, I think an AtomPub server that also supports WebDAV methods would be good thing, and this extension is something that aligns WebDAV semantics with AtomPub semantics. BR, Julian
Received on Monday, 27 October 2008 10:05:58 UTC