W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: [gears-eng] Re: [google-gears-eng] Re: Deploying new expectation-extensions

From: Jamie Lokier <jamie@shareable.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 18:27:00 +0100
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, g@shareable.org
Cc: Charles Fry <fry@google.com>, Mark Nottingham <mnot@yahoo-inc.com>, Brian McBarron <bpm@google.com>, gears-eng@googlegroups.com, Alex Rousskov <rousskov@measurement-factory.com>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <20080919172659.GA17666@shareable.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:
> > - Regarding ETags vs. URLs, one point of reference for me is CGI
> >scripts. A single CGI script running behind a fixed URL should (in my
> >mind) be able to perform a resumable upload, but this would require a
> >unique identification mechanism other than the URL.
> >...
> 
> Really? How about a query parameter?

Or PATH_INFO, since we're talking CGI.  CGI scripts receive a whole
subspace of URLs to play with as they like.

-- Jamie
Received on Friday, 19 September 2008 17:27:46 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:54 GMT