Re: HTTPS URI scheme (i128), was: https URI scheme

On Aug 27, 2008, at 12:50 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Brian Smith wrote:
>> Julian,
>> The abstract of part 1 says that part 1 defines the HTTPS scheme, but
>> Section 3.2.2 says that another document defines it. I don't know  
>> how to
>> reword things to make it non-contradictory--maybe just take out  
>> "and HTTPS"
>> from the abstract?
>
> Yes, I noticed that as well. As long as we do not define HTTPS we  
> probably should take it out.

We are going to define the https scheme in part 1 because the
syntax needs to be updated along with the http scheme.
RFC 2818 is a dead duck.

....Roy

Received on Wednesday, 27 August 2008 22:18:21 UTC