W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: opaque parameter in the Authorization request header

From: Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 20:41:28 +0200
To: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <g7v9r1$4ae$1@ger.gmane.org>

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:

> there really is no excuse for not returning it


I've no idea why RFC 2069 settled for a "should"
instead of a "must" here.  It could mean that
servers aren't forced to insist on its presence,
but if they insist on it they are not violating
the spec.  

Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2008 18:41:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Thursday, 1 October 2015 05:36:30 UTC