W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: issue 85 - range unit extensions

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 12:15:31 +0200
Message-ID: <489C1CC3.2030803@gmx.de>
To: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>
CC: 'Lisa Dusseault' <lisa@osafoundation.org>, 'Mark Nottingham' <mnot@mnot.net>, 'HTTP Working Group' <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Larry Masinter wrote:
> There is a new W3C working group proposed for working on addressing
> and accessing temporal fragments of timed media (video & audio).
> One could imagine time ranges that might be independent of the
> format.
> 
> On the other hand, I don't understand the reasons that the
> JPEG 2000 committee rejected using HTTP range retrieval for
> the J2 protocol, instead adopting query parameters in the URLs.
> In this case, the range retrieval might look like it was
> media independent even though J2 defined it specifically for
> JPEG 2000 encoded images. 
> ...

The ability to bookmark a fragment?

 > ...
> It might be worth looking into the reasons for the design
> choice in J2.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 8 August 2008 10:16:20 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:54 GMT