W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 304 (new Issue 126)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:33:44 +0200
Message-ID: <489B07C8.4050800@gmx.de>
To: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
CC: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Henrik Nordstrom wrote:
> tis 2008-08-05 klockan 22:25 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
>> Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> ...
>>> (Historical note: that statement apparently was added in 
>>> draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-08)
>>> ...
>> Seems that this issue is related to proposed text in 
>> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg-old/1997JanApr/0884.html>, 
>> which was added too verbatim to the RFC2068bis==RFC2616.
> 
> Seems so indeed.
> 
> And as it's clear what really should be referenced (internal reference
> to Date) i'd say it's an editorial issue.

Yes, I went ahead and fixed it in 
<http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/306>.

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:34:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:54 GMT