Re: Strange "downref" to RFC2068 in description of 304 (new Issue 126) from Henrik Nordstrom on 2008-08-07 (ietf-http-wg@w3.org from July to September 2008)

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:34:10 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1218119650.28467.71.camel@hlaptop.henriknordstrom.net>

tis 2008-08-05 klockan 22:25 +0200 skrev Julian Reschke:
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> > ...
> > (Historical note: that statement apparently was added in 
> > draft-ietf-http-v11-spec-08)
> > ...
> 
> Seems that this issue is related to proposed text in 
> <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/ietf-http-wg-old/1997JanApr/0884.html>, 
> which was added too verbatim to the RFC2068bis==RFC2616.

Seems so indeed.

And as it's clear what really should be referenced (internal reference
to Date) i'd say it's an editorial issue.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:33:13 UTC