Re: "Variant" language in Content-Location (Issue 109)

ons 2008-08-06 klockan 09:20 +0200 skrev Stefan Eissing:

> Is there a need to express the client's expectation that the "Content- 
> Location" URL will only have a single entity associated with it? Or  
> is a client expected to follow "Content-Location"s for a number of  
> times?

It's a protocol expectation as well, very visible in the cache model, so
yes if people really think this can be misunderstood then yes it should
be clarified that the Content-Location URI SHOULD NOT be a negotiated
resource.

(it doesn't need to be a MUST imho)

Regards
Henrik