W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: "Variant" language in Content-Location (Issue 109)

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Thu, 07 Aug 2008 16:25:38 +0200
To: Stefan Eissing <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>
Cc: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, HT TP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1218119138.28467.61.camel@hlaptop.henriknordstrom.net>

ons 2008-08-06 klockan 09:20 +0200 skrev Stefan Eissing:

> Is there a need to express the client's expectation that the "Content- 
> Location" URL will only have a single entity associated with it? Or  
> is a client expected to follow "Content-Location"s for a number of  
> times?

It's a protocol expectation as well, very visible in the cache model, so
yes if people really think this can be misunderstood then yes it should
be clarified that the Content-Location URI SHOULD NOT be a negotiated
resource.

(it doesn't need to be a MUST imho)

Regards
Henrik
Received on Thursday, 7 August 2008 14:24:44 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:54 GMT