W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Issue 113, was: Proposed resolution for Issue 13 (language tags)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2008 14:15:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4892FE5C.2020304@gmx.de>
To: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org

Felix Sasaki wrote:
> ...
> RFC 4647 defines a basic language range in sec. 2.1 which is the same as 
> the language range of sec. 14.4 of RFC 2616. Note also the information 
> in sec. 2.1 of RFC 4647:
> "Note that
> the ABNF [RFC4234] in [RFC2616] is incorrect, since it disallows the
> use of digits anywhere in the 'language-range' (see [RFC2616errata])."
> So you could just refer to basic language ranges of RFC 4647 and be fine.
> ...

Indeed, thanks for pointing this out. I missed the fact that RFC 4647 
defines basic ranges. Will make a concrete proposal later on.

BR, Julian
Received on Friday, 1 August 2008 12:35:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:53 GMT