W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: Issue 80, was: NEW ISSUE: Content-Location vs PUT/POST

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2008 19:21:41 +0200
Message-ID: <488F51A5.5040808@gmx.de>
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
CC: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>, HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

Mark Baker wrote:
> On 7/29/08, Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
>>  Proposal: just drop "PUT and POST" from the sentence, making it:
>>
>>  "The meaning of the Content-Location header in requests is
>>  undefined; servers are free to ignore it in those cases."
> 
> Eek, no, that seems to head in the opposite direction, as its meaning
> is perfectly clear AFAICT.  I say we just remove the whole sentence.

I see.

How about saying just:

   "The meaning of the Content-Location header in requests is undefined."

Because otherwise we'll get people asking where it's defined :-)

BR, Julian
Received on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 17:22:23 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:53 GMT