Mark Nottingham wrote: > > <http://tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/ticket/106> > > The Vary header doesn't say what type it is; seems like response header > is the most natural fit. Comments? It is (and already appeared in the list of response headers somewhere else). Just clarifying the introduction...: <http://www3.tools.ietf.org/wg/httpbis/trac/changeset/295> BR, JulianReceived on Tuesday, 29 July 2008 15:51:30 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Monday, 7 December 2009 10:38:33 GMT