- From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 23:14:41 +0100
- To: "Frank Ellermann" <hmdmhdfmhdjmzdtjmzdtzktdkztdjz@gmail.com>, Frank Ellermann <nobody@xyzzy.claranet.de>
- Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Ah. That was a straw-man, and definitely the weakest part of the proposal; we'd need to find the right BNF. It's a shame that they chose '=', I suppose we could do something like other-range-unit ( SP / "=" ) CHAR* Cheers, On 28/07/2008, at 7:06 PM, Frank Ellermann wrote: > > Mark Nottingham wrote: > >> How is that incompatible? > > Your syntax offers: > > | ext-content-range-spec = other-range-unit SP CHAR* > > The MSDN example is: > > | Content-Range: rows=1-2; total=2 > >> From that I guess that "rows" in <other-range-unit>, > followed by "=" instead of SP. But as I said, I've > not the faintest idea what I'm really talking about. > > Frank > > -- Mark Nottingham http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Monday, 28 July 2008 22:15:26 UTC