W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > July to September 2008

Re: i28 proposed replacement text

From: Henrik Nordstrom <henrik@henriknordstrom.net>
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2008 14:38:52 +0200
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Message-Id: <1215261532.13940.4.camel@henriknordstrom.net>
On lör, 2008-07-05 at 12:28 +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
> NEW:
> 
>     2.  If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 8.7) and the
>         "chunked" transfer-coding (Section 3.4) is used, the transfer-
>         length is defined by the use of that this transfer-coding.  If
>         the "chunked" transfer-coding is not present, the transfer-length
>         is defined by the sender closing the connection.

Hmm.. "is present" fell off somewhere.

        If a Transfer-Encoding header field (Section 8.7) is present and
        the "chunked" transfer-coding [...]
        
And to rule out any chance of people getting confused over "closing the
connection" one should perhaps overstate the Transfer-Encoding header..
last sentence again

        [...]. If a Transfer-Encoding header field is present and the
        "chunked" transfer-coding is not present, the transfer-length is
        defined by the sender closing the connection.

Regards
Henrik

Received on Saturday, 5 July 2008 12:39:35 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:52 GMT