W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > ietf-http-wg@w3.org > January to March 2008

Re: PROPOSAL: Weak Validator definition [i101]

From: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2008 22:22:35 +1100
Message-Id: <54553BB9-B7A6-478A-ADB0-9FDD40E832BC@mnot.net>
To: HTTP Working Group <ietf-http-wg@w3.org>

I haven't seen any support for Lisa's straw-man proposals, and  
discussion seems to confirm the below as the direction we want to take  
this. Closing this one (although there may be other issues nearby...).

On 11/03/2008, at 4:03 PM, Mark Nottingham wrote:

> The only proposal I've seen for this is to remove the notion of  
> "semantic equivalence" and replace it with (roughly) "good enough,  
> from the server's point of view".
> --
> Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/

Mark Nottingham     http://www.mnot.net/
Received on Tuesday, 25 March 2008 11:23:21 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Friday, 27 April 2012 06:50:37 GMT